Author summary
63% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dominic Adler results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,485 hits . Analysis detected 13,993 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (4,927 of 9,075 authors). This Dominic Adler is better (less manipulative) than 54.30% of the peer group. Dominic Adler
Author details
Total words: 15,260
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles15.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.6% 11.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 11.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst