Topic summary
55% 24 analyzed articles/videos 34,380 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Party Politics results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 12,930 hits . Analysis detected 116,136 faulty-reasoning hits from 139,548 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,866 of 22,228 topics). This Party Politics is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Party Politics
Topic details
Total words: 139,548
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.5% BS Score24 analyzed articles139.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst