Topic summary
70% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,716 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pardons results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 3,154 hits . Analysis detected 21,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,700 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (13,322 of 22,333 topics). This Pardons is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Pardons
Topic details
Total words: 20,700
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst