Author summary
87% 13 analyzed articles/videos 4,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathleen Culliton results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 3,124 hits . Analysis detected 23,035 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,484 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 62% (3,347 of 8,770 authors). This Kathleen Culliton is worse (more manipulative) than 61.80% of the peer group. Kathleen Culliton
Author details
Total words: 17,484
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.8% percentile 2.7% BS Score13 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.9% 11.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 13.5% 13.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst