Topic summary
⁠73%3 analyzed articles/videos2,113 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neoconservatism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 1,830 hits. Analysis detected 11,588 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,896 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (15,074 of 22,465 topics). This Neoconservatism is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Neoconservatism
Topic details
Total words: 13,896
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.2%13.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos