Topic summary
71% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,576 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labor Market Trends results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 2,103 hits . Analysis detected 16,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,748 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (17,571 of 23,932 topics). This Labor Market Trends is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Labor Market Trends
Topic details
Total words: 21,748
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles21.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst