Topic summary
69% 10 analyzed articles/videos 10,731 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Review results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 9,759 hits . Analysis detected 55,593 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,772 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (15,025 of 22,813 topics). This Judicial Review is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group. Judicial Review
Topic details
Total words: 56,772
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.1% percentile 1.9% BS Score10 analyzed articles56.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst