Topic summary
62% 24 analyzed articles/videos 26,287 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interviews results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 8,366 hits . Analysis detected 55,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 108,485 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (22,143 of 22,918 topics). This Interviews is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Interviews
Topic details
Total words: 108,485
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 1.0% BS Score24 analyzed articles108.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst