Author summary
â 56% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isaiah Colbert results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 3,028 hits . Analysis detected 11,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,364 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of â 57% (4,161 of 9,471 authors). This Isaiah Colbert is worse (more manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Isaiah Colbert
Author details
Total words: 13,364
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 22.7% 22.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst