Topic summary
76% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,830 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Sports results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 2,437 hits . Analysis detected 22,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,315 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (18,980 of 24,489 topics). This International Sports is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group. International Sports
Topic details
Total words: 28,315
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles28.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst