WTOP News⁠46%

British Open: Baldwin hits ‘terrifying’ opening shot after missing World Cup semi due to early start ⁠46%

By The Associated Press⁠73%

7/16/2026, 5:54:33 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 292 faulty-reasoning hits from 215 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 40.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠46% (16,728 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the article peer group.

SOUTHPORT, England (AP) — Matthew Baldwin had the honor of hitting the opening tee shot of the British Open at Royal Birkdale, where the Englishman has been a member for 23 years after growing up in the area. 
It meant needing a 3:30 a.m. alarm. 
It also meant missing one of his country’s biggest ever soccer matches. 
Baldwin said he didn’t watch England’s agonizing 2-1 loss to Argentina in the men’s World Cup semifinals, a match that started at 8 p.m. on Wednesday. 
He was dozing until waking up 55 minutes into the game and discovering England was leading 1-0. 
He fell asleep and woke up again around midnight, to be informed by his wife that England lost. 
More important to Baldwin was making a good start to his fourth appearance at the Open — and first at Birkdale. 
He said the opening shot — an iron that split the middle of the parched fairway and was approved by a cheering crowd in a full grandstand under early morning sunshine — was “terrifying” and “overwhelming.” 
“But,” added Baldwin, who shot 2-over 72, “it’s something that will stay with me for the rest of my life.” 
___ 
AP golf: https://apnews.com/hub/golf 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.2%WTOP: 2.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.0%WTOP: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 16.7%The Associated Press: 2.4%WTOP: 2.7%Availability Heuristic16.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%WTOP: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%WTOP: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%WTOP: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 24.2%The Associated Press: 8.3%WTOP: 5.6%Framing Effect24.2%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%WTOP: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%WTOP: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.3%WTOP: 1.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.3%WTOP: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%The Associated Press: 8.4%WTOP: 6.5%Negativity Bias17.7%This article: 9.8%The Associated Press: 1.7%WTOP: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%WTOP: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%WTOP: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.6%WTOP: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%WTOP: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 17.7%The Associated Press: 1.5%WTOP: 1.5%Halo Effect17.7%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.3%The Associated Press: 1.5%WTOP: 1.1%Recency Bias9.3%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%WTOP: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.7%WTOP: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%WTOP: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.8%WTOP: 2.9%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.9%WTOP: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%WTOP: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.3%WTOP: 2.2%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.3%WTOP: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%WTOP: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 26.0%The Associated Press: 4.0%WTOP: 3.3%Appeal to Emotion26.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%WTOP: 0.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.1%WTOP: 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.4%WTOP: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 5.6%The Associated Press: 1.0%WTOP: 1.2%Anecdotal5.6%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.3%WTOP: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.0%WTOP: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.1%WTOP: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%WTOP: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 1.4%WTOP: 1.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 7.4%The Associated Press: 0.8%WTOP: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection7.4%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 2.9%WTOP: 2.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.5%WTOP: 0.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.6%WTOP: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%The Associated Press: 0.2%WTOP: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%The Associated Press: 0.3%WTOP: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

215 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker38%attributed speech133writer words
Selected voice

Matthew Baldwin

100%flagged-word coverage
82 attributed words100% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Quote-first Misdirection-12.0 ptsWriter: 12.0%Matthew Baldwin: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.3 ptsWriter: 2.3%Matthew Baldwin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.