Author summary
77% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,632 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dylan Gwinn results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 2,065 hits . Analysis detected 10,672 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,528 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,794 of 8,712 authors). This Dylan Gwinn is worse (more manipulative) than 56.50% of the peer group. Dylan Gwinn
Author details
Total words: 10,528
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles10.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.6% 19.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst