Topic summary
70% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Intelligence Community results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 2,322 hits . Analysis detected 18,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,452 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 39% (14,139 of 22,944 topics). This Intelligence Community is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Intelligence Community
Topic details
Total words: 20,452
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score8 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst