Author summary
64%4 analyzed articles/videos5,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Baratta results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 2,538 hits. Analysis detected 15,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,244 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,410 of 9,471 authors). This James Baratta is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group.
James Baratta
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
33%James Baratta (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,244
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510032.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles20.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.5%12.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos