Topic summary
55% 11 analyzed articles/videos 7,892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration And Customs Enforcement results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 3,842 hits . Analysis detected 26,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,062 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (18,426 of 22,655 topics). This Immigration And Customs Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Immigration And Customs Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 34,062
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.7% percentile 1.5% BS Score11 analyzed articles34.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst