Topic summary
⁠38%2 analyzed articles/videos1,641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Georgia Lottery results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,068 hits. Analysis detected 4,231 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,564 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (14,486 of 22,228 topics). This Georgia Lottery is better (less manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Georgia Lottery
Topic details
Total words: 6,564
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.8% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 16.3%16.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 16.3%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos