Topic summary
32% 19 analyzed articles/videos 17,995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Genetics results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 4,658 hits . Analysis detected 43,464 faulty-reasoning hits from 87,341 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (23,598 of 24,545 topics). This Genetics is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group. Genetics
Topic details
Total words: 87,341
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.9% percentile 1.0% BS Score19 analyzed articles87.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst