Author summary
37% 4 analyzed articles/videos 863 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sara Hashemi results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Overconfidence Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 806 hits . Analysis detected 3,632 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,412 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,218 of 8,974 authors). This Sara Hashemi is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Sara Hashemi
Author details
Total words: 7,412
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 10.9% 10.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst