Author summary
77%6 analyzed articles/videos2,539 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marina Temkin results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,308 hits. Analysis detected 9,771 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,156 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 61% (3,354 of 8,524 authors). This Marina Temkin is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Marina Temkin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
61%Marina Temkin (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 10,156
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.9%12.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.5%6.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 12.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate