Topic summary
88% 8 analyzed articles/videos 11,343 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Affirming Care results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 5,344 hits . Analysis detected 41,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,151 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (15,910 of 22,835 topics). This Gender Affirming Care is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Gender Affirming Care
Topic details
Total words: 44,151
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score8 analyzed articles44.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.4% 9.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst