Topic summary
39% 43 analyzed articles/videos 24,123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foodborne Illness results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 5,817 hits . Analysis detected 53,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 94,355 analyzed words across 43 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 7% (22,831 of 24,545 topics). This Foodborne Illness is better (less manipulative) than 93.00% of the peer group. Foodborne Illness
Topic details
Total words: 94,355
Article count: 43
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.0% percentile 1.1% BS Score43 analyzed articles94.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst