Topic summary
43% 48 analyzed articles/videos 33,010 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Safety results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 9,425 hits . Analysis detected 85,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 138,234 analyzed words across 48 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (22,102 of 23,863 topics). This Food Safety is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Food Safety
Topic details
Total words: 138,234
Article count: 48
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.1% BS Score48 analyzed articles138.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst