Hold the onions: Colorado women sue Taylor Farms, McDonald’s for E. coli infections 6%

By Sage Kelley24%

8/7/2026, 5:40:44 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Red Herring, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 581 faulty-reasoning hits from 623 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 13.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (29,032 of 30,584 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the article peer group.

Taylor Farms can’t seem to catch a break  or keep its produce free of pathogens. 
Two Colorado women, Patricia Sherrill and Meredith Sheppard, filed a lawsuit in Mesa County District Court against Taylor Farms and McDonald’s on Aug. 4 over a case of E. coli that allegedly started from a batch of slivered yellow onions back in 2024, claiming that two separate restaurants in the area gave them significantly upset stomachs. 
Not the kind that comes from parasites on shredded lettuce, which Taylor Farms and parts of the country are currently dealing with, but something more familiar. 
Sherrill’s attorney says she ate Quarter Pounders with slivered onions from a McDonald’s location in Grand Junction on Sept. 
26, Sept. 30 and Oct. 4 of 2024. 
She allegedly became “very sick” on Oct. 7, 2024, with diarrhea and stomach pain before being treated at a nearby hospital. 
According to the lawsuit, she tested positive for E. coli, Shiga toxin and Clostridium diff, all of which are known to cause severe diarrhea, stomach cramps and other forms of abdominal pain. 
Sherrill says she was in pain for “days” after her hospitalization, and claims to have experienced “emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life and medical expenses” from of the ordeal. 
Sheppard reportedly ate burgers with added slivered onions from a store in Clifton on seven separate dates in October 2024. 
On Oct. 31, she allegedly developed abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea before testing positive for E. coli at a clinic and checking into a hospital in Grand Junction on Nov. 
7, 2024. 
She, too, says she underwent a “loss of enjoyment of life” and “economic losses” that come with the stomach-rumbling effects of E. coli. 
According to the FDA, 104 people reported getting sick and 34 were hospitalized across 14 states between October and December 2024 with E. coli, with the infections linked to McDonald’s Quarter Pounders containing onions distributed by Taylor Farms. 
Colorado was hit the hardest, even seeing one death in Mesa County. 
The FDA issued a consumer recall that fall, with Taylor Farms contacting stores directly. 
The FDA also reported dozens of violations at Taylor Farms’ Colorado Springs facility during an inspection after the outbreak. 
By the time Taylor Farms recalled the onions, Sherrill and Sheppard had both already eaten three of Quarter Pounders apiece, they allege. 
Other defendants include Mile Hi Foods, a local food distributor to McDonald’s, and King Ventures, which owns McDonald’s chains in Colorado. 
According to the complaint, the action of distributing and selling the onions constitutes a “product liability action,” because the plaintiffs were injured after ingesting a product that was manufactured, packaged and sold without a warning “concerning a defective and unreasonably dangerous food product.” 
The lawsuit seeks compensatory relief from the four companies, claiming that both a manufacturing defect and a food product defect violated local and federal food and drug laws. 
Taylor Farms did not respond to a request for comment. 
This isn’t the only heat sparking beneath Taylor Farms right now. 
Throughout the summer, the produce distributor's shredded iceberg lettuce has been connected to the parasitic illness, cyclosporiasis, which causes “explosive” diarrhea. 
Investigators with the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said they had identified the distributor's lettuce as a potential source of contamination in the outbreak, but later rescinded it after testing and a “false positive.” 
But a voluntary company-issued recall from Taylor Farms for its shredded lettuce remains in effect. 
On an unrelated note: Taylor Farms donated $1 million MAGA Inc., a super PAC supporting Donald Trump, in 2025. 
The company also donated $850,000 to AFP Action, an anti-regulation super PAC, between 2020 and 2024. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.9%Denver Westword: 1.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Sage Kelley: 0.3%Denver Westword: 0.6%Anchoring Bias1.8%This article: 6.1%Sage Kelley: 1.3%Denver Westword: 1.7%Availability Heuristic6.1%This article: 4.2%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.4%Denver Westword: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%Sage Kelley: 0.7%Denver Westword: 0.6%Overconfidence Bias5.9%This article: 5.1%Sage Kelley: 2.5%Denver Westword: 2.7%Framing Effect5.1%This article: 8.5%Sage Kelley: 0.6%Denver Westword: 0.4%Loss Aversion8.5%This article: 4.7%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.7%Denver Westword: 1.5%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.9%Denver Westword: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Sage Kelley: 4.6%Denver Westword: 4.8%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.2%Denver Westword: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.7%Denver Westword: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.6%Denver Westword: 0.4%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.9%Denver Westword: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.7%Denver Westword: 0.5%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.5%Denver Westword: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.0%Sage Kelley: 1.0%Denver Westword: 1.7%Appeal to Authority3.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.3%Denver Westword: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.3%Denver Westword: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 2.4%Denver Westword: 2.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 7.4%Sage Kelley: 0.4%Denver Westword: 0.1%Red Herring7.4%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.4%Denver Westword: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.6%Sage Kelley: 4.7%Denver Westword: 2.9%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Sage Kelley: 0.9%Denver Westword: 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 4.5%Sage Kelley: 0.7%Denver Westword: 0.5%Burden of Proof4.5%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 1.5%Denver Westword: 1.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.5%Denver Westword: 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Sage Kelley: 0.3%Denver Westword: 0.7%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.2%Denver Westword: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.0%Sage Kelley: 1.9%Denver Westword: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice3.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.3%Denver Westword: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.1%Denver Westword: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Sage Kelley: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

623 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers28%attributed speech447writer words
37 attributed words21% of attributed speech43% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Investigators with the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Investigators with the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Investigators with the FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.