Topic summary
85% 53 analyzed articles/videos 36,887 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Availability Heuristic , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 16,065 hits . Analysis detected 130,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 179,366 analyzed words across 53 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (20,829 of 24,718 topics). This Food is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group. Food
Topic details
Total words: 179,366
Article count: 53
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score53 analyzed articles179.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst