Topic summary
⁠64%4 analyzed articles/videos3,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Crimes results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 1,375 hits. Analysis detected 9,195 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,305 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠25% (17,125 of 22,715 topics). This Financial Crimes is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Financial Crimes
Topic details
Total words: 12,305
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos