Topic summary
75% 19 analyzed articles/videos 14,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal Funding results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 6,192 hits . Analysis detected 45,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,535 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (16,923 of 23,729 topics). This Federal Funding is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Federal Funding
Topic details
Total words: 54,535
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score19 analyzed articles54.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst