Author summary
17%2 analyzed articles/videos738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Logan Adams results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 166 hits. Analysis detected 1,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,952 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (5,869 of 8,614 authors). This Logan Adams is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Logan Adams
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
32%Logan Adams (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,952
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate