Publication summary
21% 1 analyzed article/video 1,815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Daily results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 539 hits . Analysis detected 3,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,260 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 59% (240 of 584 publications). This Medical Daily is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 7,260
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst