Topic summary
⁠82%5 analyzed articles/videos1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fda Approval results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,194 hits. Analysis detected 11,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,715 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (12,449 of 24,545 topics). This Fda Approval is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group.
Fda Approval

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510049.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos