Topic summary
19% 18 analyzed articles/videos 7,117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Accident results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 2,651 hits . Analysis detected 14,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,214 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (21,340 of 22,633 topics). This Fatal Accident is better (less manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group. Fatal Accident
Topic details
Total words: 33,214
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.7% percentile 1.1% BS Score18 analyzed articles33.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst