Author summary
â 49% 8 analyzed articles/videos 2,468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kade Heather results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,813 hits . Analysis detected 14,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,044 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of â 32% (6,044 of 8,774 authors). This Kade Heather is better (less manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group. Kade Heather
Author details
Total words: 19,044
Article count: 8
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score8 analyzed articles19K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst