Topic summary
96% 10 analyzed articles/videos 12,481 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fascism results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 7,133 hits . Analysis detected 60,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,060 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (12,891 of 24,545 topics). This Fascism is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Fascism
Topic details
Total words: 49,060
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score10 analyzed articles49.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst