Topic summary
⁠62%5 analyzed articles/videos3,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fan Engagement results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Halo Effect, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,733 hits. Analysis detected 14,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,125 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (19,016 of 24,576 topics). This Fan Engagement is better (less manipulative) than 77.40% of the peer group.
Fan Engagement
Topic details
Total words: 21,125
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

23% percentile
025507510022.6% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles21.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 8.2%8.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos