Topic summary
67% 7 analyzed articles/videos 7,185 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Family Separation results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 5,063 hits . Analysis detected 23,981 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,967 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 10% (22,111 of 24,545 topics). This Family Separation is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. Family Separation
Topic details
Total words: 40,967
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles41K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.0% 0.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst