Author summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 3,884 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Greg Constantine results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 2,240 hits . Analysis detected 8,326 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,759 of 9,487 authors). This Greg Constantine is better (less manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group. Greg Constantine
Author details
Total words: 15,536
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.2% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.0% 0.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst