Topic summary
34%6 analyzed articles/videos4,592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Exploitation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 1,299 hits. Analysis detected 8,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,185 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 14% (21,195 of 24,564 topics). This Exploitation is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Exploitation
Topic details
Total words: 17,185
Article count: 6
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.6%7.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate