Author summary
18% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,255 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Sayles results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Negativity Bias , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 1,835 hits . Analysis detected 6,591 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,636 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 7% (8,431 of 9,053 authors). This Samantha Sayles is better (less manipulative) than 93.10% of the peer group. Samantha Sayles
Author details
Total words: 18,636
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.9% percentile 1.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles18.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst