Author summary
12%1 analyzed article/video551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richard Estrada results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 663 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 43% (5,247 of 9,188 authors). This Richard Estrada is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Richard Estrada
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
43%Richard Estrada (selected)3%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,204
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.6%4.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.8%1.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 13.7%13.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Author 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.7%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos