Topic summary
53% 109 analyzed articles/videos 109,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Policy results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 38,850 hits . Analysis detected 364,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 517,390 analyzed words across 109 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (20,167 of 22,833 topics). This Environmental Policy is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Environmental Policy
Topic details
Total words: 517,390
Article count: 109
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score109 analyzed articles517.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst