BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Confirmation Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 165 hits. Analysis detected 1,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,086 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.3% and a BS Rank of 32% (19,876 of 28,882 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the article peer group.

Assemblymember Carl DeMaio during a press conference at the state Capitol in Sacramento on Aug. 
18, 2025. 
Photo by Miguel Gutierrez Jr., CalMatters 
California Republicans have a choice in their quest to snap a 20-year losing streak in statewide elections: Moderate their positions on certain issues to appeal to more voters, or lean further to the right to rile up support from the base. 
Assemblymember Carl DeMaio, the San Diego Republican with a YouTube channel and his own political movement, is going for the latter . 
As CalMatters’ Nadia Lathan explains, DeMaio  whose combative style has earned him a reputation of being a divisive lawmaker  drew ire from his fellow GOP colleagues during the June primary after his Reform California advocated for different candidates than the California Republican Party. 
Party officials sent DeMaio a cease-and-desist letter, accusing him of co-opting the GOP’s branding. 
But in the end, it didn’t matter: Several of his candidates for the Legislature beat establishment Republican picks in the San Diego area, as well as one in the Central Valley. 
In the race for San Diego’s Senate District 40, DeMaio backed Kristie Bruce-Lane, who he characterized as a “fighter,” and someone who could exchange blows with Democratic lawmakers. 
Bruce-Lane’s campaign raised about $250,000 with the help of DeMaio’s Reform Local Government PAC. 
Her opponent, San Marcos City Councilmember Ed Musgrove, raised $2 million. 
The longtime local official with a low-key demeanor also earned the endorsement of well-known Republicans including Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones and outgoing U.S. 
Rep. 
Darrell Issa. 
Bruce-Lane won. 
She will face former Democratic San Diego City Attorney Mara Elliott in November. 
Elsewhere around the Capitol: California Democrats are deeply divided over the proposed billionaire tax. 
The California Democratic Party last week officially endorsed the measure after a contentious vote, despite Gov. 
Gavin Newsom and Democratic gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra publicly opposing Proposition 40. 
Read more from CalMatters’ Maya C. 
Miller and Jeanne Kuang. 
CalMatters events: Join us today in Riverside for a free conversation about how California will educate its future workforce. 
CalMatters’ Adam Echelman will moderate a discussion with health, education and workforce leaders. 
Register here . 
Other Stories You Should Know 
CA batting .800 in Trump lawsuits 
Attorney General Rob Bonta at the Ronald Reagan State Building in Los Angeles on May 14, 2026. 
Photo by Christina House, Los Angeles Times via Getty Images 
When President Donald Trump returned to the White House last year, California lawmakers quickly allocated $25 million to fund anticipated legal battles against his administration. 
On Tuesday  18 months into Trump’s second term  California Attorney General Rob Bonta gave a status update : After suing the Trump administration dozens of times, the state has protected $207 billion in funding that Trump has tried to withhold from California. 
Of the 79 lawsuits California brought against Trump through July 30, the state secured 21 final orders and 45 orders granting early relief in its favor. 
In another eight cases, the Trump administration withdrew its efforts to fight the lawsuit. 
The money that Trump attempted to take away spanned a variety of funds that went toward schools, food benefits, public safety, climate projects and other programs. 
Bonta: “If I was the Trump administration and I’m losing 83% of the time when I take actions that are unlawful and when I’m challenged by attorneys general, I’d be embarrassed. 
I’d be humiliated. 
I would stop being unlawful. 
But Trump shows no sign of slowing down.” 
Bonta estimates that the state’s Department of Justice has spent as much as $29 million so far fighting Trump in court: Roughly $19.2 million of which came from the special fund set up in 2025, and the rest coming from the general fund specifically appropriated for “federal accountability work” in the regular state budget process. 
Worry over Trump changes to Head Start 
Preschoolers line up at the Ralph Hawley Head Start Center in Emeryville on Dec. 
9, 2024. 
Photo by Florence Middleton for CalMatters 
The Trump administration appears poised to overhaul Head Start in a way that critics warn could lower the program’s standards, including at more than 1,800 sites in California, writes CalMatters’ Carolyn Jones. 
The federal government said it plans to “significantly reduce regulatory requirements” for the early childhood education program. 
Though the administration did not provide details, some reports say the move could affect the 70,000 California kids enrolled in Head Start by changing the program’s low student-to-teacher ratios, minimum teacher qualifications and stipulations that Head Start accept income-eligible children regardless of whether they’re disabled or if their parents are citizens. 
Melanee Cottrill , executive director of Head Start California: “Head Start will still exist, but it will be very different from what it is today.” 
And lastly: Colorado River plan leaves states guessing 
A bleached “bathtub ring” is visible on the banks of Lake Powell in Page, Arizona on July 30, 2026. 
Photo by Justin Sullivan, Getty Images 
The U.S. 
Bureau of Reclamation last week released a 10-year framework that establishes rough parameters for managing the Colorado River. 
Though its provisions include an estimated 10% cut to California’s supply through 2028, officials are still left uncertain about the future since the framework imposes no specific long-term plan. 
Read more from CalMatters’ Rachel Becker. 
CalMatters columnist Dan Walters: Sacramento City Unified School District and Los Angeles Unified’s budget woes, which stem from a chronic tendency to overspend revenues, are exacerbated by the state’s own irresponsible fiscal games . 
Other things worth your time: 
Some stories may require a subscription to read. 
California judge holds Homeland Security in contempt in case over LA immigration sweeps // CalMatters (free) 
Trump’s mail voting order is set to implode the midterms, CA tells SCOTUS // San Francisco Chronicle (gift link) 
White House whipsaws Silicon Valle y (and itself) over AI rule // The New York Times (gift link) 
CA AI transparency law’s first phase cracks down on deepfakes, scams // The Sacramento Bee (gift link) 
AI is being used to boost Medicaid enrollment in CA, but not without concerns // Capital & Main (free) 
Prediction market bets on wildfires draw scrutiny from senators // Bloomberg (gift link) 
Edison equipment caused deadly Eaton Fire, LA County Fire investigators conclude // LAist (free) 
Report says bill allowing state workers to telework could save CA millions // The Sacramento Bee (gift link) 
Teachers have some big wins in this year’s CA budget. 
Here are their victories // EdSource (free) 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 7.3%Lynn La: 1.5%CalMatters: 2.2%Confirmation Bias7.3%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.5%CalMatters: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.7%Lynn La: 2.5%CalMatters: 2.3%Availability Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Lynn La: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Overconfidence Bias5.1%This article: 1.2%Lynn La: 5.7%CalMatters: 4.7%Framing Effect1.2%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.8%CalMatters: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Lynn La: 1.7%CalMatters: 1.7%Pessimism Bias3.7%This article: 10.2%Lynn La: 8.4%CalMatters: 7.0%Negativity Bias10.2%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Lynn La: 0.8%CalMatters: 0.5%In-Group Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Lynn La: 0.6%CalMatters: 1.0%Halo Effect2.2%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.5%Lynn La: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias5.5%This article: 2.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 2.6%CalMatters: 2.7%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 3.8%Lynn La: 1.2%CalMatters: 0.9%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 2.9%Lynn La: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.0%Slippery Slope2.9%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.0%Lynn La: 3.4%CalMatters: 2.9%Hasty Generalization6.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.1%Lynn La: 5.3%CalMatters: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion3.1%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.9%Lynn La: 1.7%CalMatters: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.9%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.9%CalMatters: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.3%Lynn La: 1.4%CalMatters: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.3%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.1%Lynn La: 3.6%CalMatters: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice4.1%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 1.6%CalMatters: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lynn La: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 15.2%Lynn La: 3.5%CalMatters: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…15.2%

1086 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers15%attributed speech919writer words
Selected voice

Dan Walters

100%flagged-word coverage
34 attributed words20% of attributed speech64% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -18.0 ptsWriter: 18.0%Dan Walters: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.9 ptsWriter: 4.9%Dan Walters: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.