Author summary
⁠56%5 analyzed articles/videos5,219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joseph Winters results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,819 hits. Analysis detected 14,683 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,876 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (6,428 of 8,683 authors). This Joseph Winters is better (less manipulative) than 74.00% of the peer group.
Joseph Winters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Hannah Martin1%
⁠0%Paul DeMark1%
⁠0%Emma Sedlak1%
⁠0%Michael Fox1%
⁠0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
⁠26%Joseph Winters (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,876
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

26% percentile
025507510026.0% percentile
1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles20.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos