Topic summary
75% 14 analyzed articles/videos 11,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Interference results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 5,283 hits . Analysis detected 56,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,286 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (16,226 of 24,545 topics). This Election Interference is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Election Interference
Topic details
Total words: 57,286
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 1.9% BS Score14 analyzed articles57.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst