Topic summary
69% 10 analyzed articles/videos 9,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Economic Sanctions results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 2,994 hits . Analysis detected 33,846 faulty-reasoning hits from 43,282 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (18,899 of 23,430 topics). This Economic Sanctions is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the peer group. Economic Sanctions
Topic details
Total words: 43,282
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.3% percentile 1.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles43.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst