Publication summary
51% 24 analyzed articles/videos 18,715 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Center for Strategic and International Studies results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 5,244 hits . Analysis detected 56,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 90,203 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 38% (364 of 584 publications). This Center for Strategic and International Studies is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group. Center for Strategic and International Studies Publication details
Total words: 90,203
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.7% percentile 1.2% BS Score24 analyzed articles90.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
CSIS 51% 7/15/2026, 2:30:00 AM
CSIS 51% 7/8/2026, 3:00:00 AM
CSIS 51% 7/7/2026, 2:00:00 AM
CSIS 51% 7/2/2026, 3:00:00 AM
CSIS 51% 7/2/2026, 3:00:00 AM