Topic summary
64%4 analyzed articles/videos3,440 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dna results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,086 hits. Analysis detected 7,157 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,453 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (16,048 of 24,545 topics). This Dna is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.6% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 7.8%7.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate