Topic summary
⁠77%5 analyzed articles/videos2,886 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Disney results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 1,050 hits. Analysis detected 9,184 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,771 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (16,845 of 24,135 topics). This Disney is better (less manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Disney

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.7%6.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos