Author summary
98% 6 analyzed articles/videos 4,208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristine Parks results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,923 hits . Analysis detected 20,685 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,225 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 65% (3,402 of 9,487 authors). This Kristine Parks is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Kristine Parks
Author details
Total words: 15,225
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.1% percentile 2.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles15.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.3% 12.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 12.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.6%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst