Topic summary
38% 8 analyzed articles/videos 3,465 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Court Cases results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 1,201 hits . Analysis detected 10,815 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,420 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (19,680 of 22,580 topics). This Court Cases is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Court Cases
Topic details
Total words: 17,420
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score8 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst