Author summary
39%5 analyzed articles/videos3,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abby Patkin results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 1,471 hits. Analysis detected 8,642 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,752 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (6,171 of 8,524 authors). This Abby Patkin is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group.
Abby Patkin
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
28%Abby Patkin (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,752
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

28% percentile
025507510027.6% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.1%4.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate