Topic summary
92% 8 analyzed articles/videos 7,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Corporate Leadership results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 3,079 hits . Analysis detected 25,851 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,024 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (15,003 of 22,261 topics). This Corporate Leadership is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Corporate Leadership
Topic details
Total words: 29,024
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score8 analyzed articles29K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst